Sex abuse suit filed against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Great Falls-Billings

A third lawsuit alleging abuse by Catholic clergy in Montana was filed Wednesday morning in Great Falls — this time from 10 plaintiffs alleging sexual assault by priests from within the Roman Catholic Diocese of Great Falls-Billings.

The only named plaintiff in the case, Timothy Becker, alleged that the Rev. Ted Szudera, who until last month was in active ministry in Stanford, abused him in 1978 and 1979 while Szudera was a priest in Livingston. Becker said in an interview Wednesday that he attended St. Mary’s Catholic School and the St. Mary parish in Livingston growing up, and that the alleged abuse occurred both in the church and in the school.

The Great Falls-Billings Diocese denied the allegations against Szudera, saying that an earlier accusation against Szudera brought to the church by Becker in 2006 was deemed unfounded after the diocese hired a private investigator to look into the allegation.

The Rev. Jay Peterson, vicar general for the Great Falls-Billings Diocese, said the other allegations set forth in the lawsuit were never brought to the church’s attention.

In a press conference Wednesday announcing the suit’s filing, attorney Tim Kosnoff of the Seattle-based law firm of Kosnoff Fasy said Becker and nine other plaintiffs told them about “appalling instances of sexual abuse going on for years” at the hands of priests and nuns in various places across Montana.

“The abuse is of the most hideous nature I’ve ever seen,” Kosnoff said, later adding a call to the Attorney General’s Office to investigate all claims of clerical abuse coming out of Montana.

Attorney General Steve Bullock responded with a statement that read in part:

“My top priority is keeping kids safe. Allegations of sexual abuse are always distressing, especially when the alleged perpetrator is in a position of trust.”

Bullock’s statement further reads that as of 4:30 Wednesday afternoon, his office asked for a copy of the complaint but didn’t get one.

“However, if it alleges that crimes have been committed, we encourage the victims to immediately contact their local law enforcement agency so those allegations can be investigated.”

The lawsuit is the third filed against the Catholic Church in Montana since last year and the first against the diocese that covers the central and eastern parts of the state. Montana plaintiffs were among a large group who received a $166 million settlement last year in a suit against the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus. Some 160 plaintiffs also filed a sex abuse suit against the Diocese of Helena last year.

Kosnoff, whose firm represented a portion of the plaintiffs in both of those cases, said more Montana victims began coming forward after the other two suits began garnering publicity. In the firm’s experience in bringing suits against branches of the Catholic Church in the Rocky Mountain and Pacific regions, the attorneys said the number of claims coming out of Montana was alarming, saying that there have been more claims coming out of Montana than in the state of Washington.

“We’re really just seeing the tip of the iceberg here,” said Dan Fasy, a partner in the Seattle firm.

Kosnoff said he was especially troubled at the nature of the abuse described by plaintiffs in the most recent case, saying that “nothing is left to the imagination.” He said he was especially troubled that Szudera, one of the alleged abusers, was at one point a part of the Great Falls-Billings Diocese’s independent review board that takes up claims of abuse brought before the local church leadership. Kosnoff also accused the diocese of brushing away Becker’s allegations of abuse in 2006, when Becker brought the issue before the review board.

“They took no action against Father Szudera,” Kosnoff said. “It was a white-wash.”

Peterson, the vicar general of the diocese, was on the review board that heard Becker’s 2006 complaint. He said the board made a unanimous decision not to take any further action after a private investigator determined Becker’s allegations were unfounded. Peterson said that Szudera was not a member of the review board at the time.

“We followed our policy,” Peterson said. “We got the best input and advice we could.”

Peterson said that Bryan Lockerby, a captain at the Great Falls Police Department who also works as a private investigator, was the one who investigated Becker’s allegation and found that it was unfounded.

“It was very thorough and independent,” Peterson said of the investigation.

Lockerby said he could not confirm whether he did any work for the diocese, citing a confidentiality agreement he has with his clients, but he did confirm that he is called upon by various people to work as a private investigator.

Peterson said that Szudera is no longer active in ministry and that he took a leave of absence that was effective as of Jan. 1. Peterson said the leave of absence had nothing to do with the allegation against him and was not a disciplinary measure.

“Father Ted had been requesting a sabbatical for quite some time — a well-deserved sabbatical,” Peterson said.

Peterson denied the allegations set forth in the lawsuit and said that the diocese would fight it in court.

Peterson said Szudera was appointed to the review board after the 2006 hearing and added that he didn’t remember there being any kind of hesitation from the board because of the previous allegation.

“He was exonerated,” Peterson said.

Attempts to reach Szudera at his most recent listed number were not returned Wednesday.

Peterson also put out a news release Wednesday that accused the attorneys behind the lawsuit of making “sweeping allegations” and attempting to “try these claims in a court of public opinion in hopes of generating new potential claimants.”

“Diocese of Great Falls-Billings has not been served with any complaint, and when it is, these claims and any valid defenses afforded the diocese will be properly handled in the courts,” the statement reads in part. “In the meantime, it seems inappropriate for any involved attorney to comment on the litigation.”

The release states that the diocese has had a policy for reporting abuse from clergy members in place since the early 1990s and that information on how to report abuse is posted in churches and published in the diocese newspaper, The Harvest.

With the exception of Becker’s 2006 complaint, the other allegations in the lawsuit were never brought to the diocese’s attention, Peterson wrote in the release.

“Rather than bring these claims to the attention of the diocese through its publicized reporting procedure so the diocese could respond and assist any victims, it appears the claimants have instead chosen to file a lawsuit while their attorneys engage in inflammatory rhetoric,” the release reads.

Becker, who now lives in Salt Lake City, said that he was not satisfied with the diocese’s reaction when he brought his abuse allegation to its review board in 2006.

“It was like a cold room of people just staring at you,” Becker said of the hearing, adding that it was like “I was speaking to the wall.”

Becker said he met with three people initially in May 2006: Peterson, the diocese’s attorney Maxon Davis and diocese business manager Joseph Luncki. In August of that year, another member of the review board whom Becker didn’t name visited him in Salt Lake City. Becker said that in the end, the board agreed to pay for his therapy sessions.

“He said ‘I hope you get well,’ and that was it,” Becker said.

Peterson confirmed that the diocese did agree to pay for Becker’s counseling.

“We did offer some counseling out of a pastoral concern,” he said.

Becker said that he is still a “strict Catholic,” but finds himself having trouble trusting any priest he meets now.

“Priests are just like everybody else — human beings — and they have to be accountable for what they do wrong,” Becker said. “I’m hoping to make it clear that anybody who is abused needs to come forward and make it known that they can’t do these things to any of God’s children.”

Leander James, an attorney out of Coeur d’Alene who is also representing the plaintiffs, said Wednesday that the diocese’s reporting process is biased and doesn’t seem to be offering real solutions to the problem of clerical abuse.

“This is not a process that should be internal,” said James, who is also Catholic. “Doesn’t that smack of aiding and abetting a cover up? … It’s the fox guarding the hen house.”

The nine other plaintiffs, seven men and two women, are identified only by initials and allege abuse by priests in the St. Xavier mission on the Crow Indian Reservation, the St. Xavier Church in Hardin, St. Michael’s Church in Absarokee, the St. Paul’s Mission in Hays, the now-shuttered St. Thomas Orphanage in Great Falls and an un-named church in Wolf Point. All the plaintiffs allege the abuse occurred when they were children.

The 22-page complaint also names, fully or partially, other priests besides Szudera as alleged abusers: Edmund Robinson of the St. Paul Mission in Hays, James Reynolds of the Wolf Point church, a “Father Heretick” of Absarokee and a “Father O’Reilly” at the St. Xavier Mission.

The diocese is the only defendant named in the case, although the filing also leaves open 10 spaces each for additional corporate entities or individuals.

The suit asks for monetary damages for pain and suffering as well as punitive damages “in an amount sufficient to serve as a warning and example to others.” The amounts of those damages will be determined later by a jury if the case makes it to court.

Kosnoff said that most cases similar to this one end with a settlement before reaching court.

The complaint also calls for a number of “equitable relief” measures, including:

  • that the Diocese post the names of all known abusers on its website;
  • that all clergy and staff within the diocese annually sign a document stating that they have never abused a minor at any time nor do they have knowledge of anyone else who has abused a minor;
  • that the diocese bishop, Michael Warfel, issue a letter of apology to all the plaintiffs; and
  • that a “statement of gratitude” to the alleged victims be published on the diocese website and as full page ads in the Billings Gazette and Great Falls Tribune.

Complete Article HERE!

Vatican prosecutor warns bishops to follow church law on child abuse

This is perfect!  “I’m not saying that we should start punishing everybody for any negligence in his duties. But … it is not acceptable that when there are set standards, people do not follow the set standards.”  Talking tough, but there will be no consequences unless you’re caught red handed.

Vatican prosecutor bluntly warned Catholic bishops Wednesday that they could be disciplined if they do not follow church law and standards when managing priests who have abused children.

Monsignor Charles Scicluna, who handles sex crime prosecutions for the Vatican, told reporters that bishops would be held accountable under church law for how they deal with abusive clerics.

“It is a crime in canon law to show malicious or fraudulent negligence in the exercise of one’s duty,” Scicluna told journalists, according to an Associated Press report. “I’m not saying that we should start punishing everybody for any negligence in his duties. But … it is not acceptable that when there are set standards, people do not follow the set standards.”

It’s a familiar topic for Catholics in Kansas City, where Bishop Robert W. Finn and the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph are facing misdemeanor charges in Jackson County for purportedly not reporting suspicions of child abuse by the Rev. Shawn Ratigan.

Finn and lawyers representing the diocese have entered not-guilty pleas to the charges, and trial is scheduled for September.

Scicluna is participating in Rome at a four-day church conference on child abuse that concludes today.

His tough new talk of church discipline for bishops raises a curtain on a church legal system of which even Catholics may only be vaguely aware.

Canon law, the church’s own regulatory system, generally comes to mind only when a Catholic seeks an annulment. It is, however, a legal system that traces its history back well more than 1,000 years.

Canon lawyers say church law complements civil law on child sexual abuse and dictates how clergy are to properly respond to such reports.

Lawyers with an interest in the myriad court cases spawned by the Kansas City scandal occasionally have used canon law to explain how and why the church is responding to its new legal quagmire.

Former U.S. Attorney Todd Graves, who was commissioned by the diocese to study the church’s handling of the Ratigan case, recognized the importance of canon law. He devoted more than 10 pages of his report, which was released two months before charges were filed, to an explanation of church law.

But canon law should not be viewed as a religious mystery, one expert said recently.

Nicholas Cafardi, former general counsel for the Diocese of Pittsburgh, dismissed a notion recently making the rounds among Kansas City lawyers that the diocese could not resolve its case through a plea agreement because the diocese — as an expression of the “Body of Christ” — could not make the required admissions.

“The canon is not a theological document,” Cafardi said. “ ‘The Body of Christ’ is a great theological concept, but it doesn’t do anything for us legally. We don’t want to use theological concepts to create legal relationships.”

The law and the church

Codified in the 12th century and extensively revised twice in the 20th century, canon law set out the structure of church governance, defined the responsibilities of clerics and established a legal system with rights, standards of evidence and expectations for church lawyers, judges and prosecutors.

The church laws most directly applicable to the U.S. church on child abuse issues are known, in shorthand, as the “Essential Norms.” U.S. bishops crafted the norms in 2002, and the Vatican quickly recognized them as binding church law.

Cafardi noted that church law is in almost complete harmony with secular law in dictating how the diocese and its leaders are to handle child abuse cases.

“There’s nothing in the Code of Canon Law that says you are relieved of your responsibilities under civil law,” Cafardi said.

Under the norms, clerics are required to report child abuse to civil authorities and then cooperate with their investigation.

Other canon lawyers said that if Kansas City clerics were confused or uncertain if they should have reported Ratigan under civil law, canon law made their responsibilities clear.

Just seven months before Ratigan’s laptop, allegedly containing disturbing photographs of naked girls, landed on the desk of a chancery official, Pope Benedict XVI said child pornography was an act of sexual abuse of a minor.

Under canon law, a church official with evidence of that crime must trigger the diocese’s child abuse investigation and reporting programs, including calls to civil investigators, experts said.

In the early days of the Ratigan scandal, Monsignor Robert Murphy, Finn’s second in command, delayed notifying civil authorities until he had obtained narrow legal opinions that the images were not pornographic, according to the Graves report.

Patrick Wall, a canon lawyer and former Catholic priest, said that even before soliciting the legal opinions, Murphy was obligated under church law to make the report.

Because Murphy was asking questions about child pornography, he clearly was aware that it could have been present on Ratigan’s computer, Wall said.

“According to the law the Vatican established, he needed to call the cops, tell … Bishop Finn and start the process,” Wall said.

A lawyer representing Murphy declined to comment. He has not been charged in the case.

Though Finn has received unprecedented scrutiny from civil authorities for his handling of the Ratigan case, the scrutiny he faces within the church remains a mystery to the public.

He could get feedback on his work in the diocese next month when he and other regional bishops travel to Rome to meet with the pope and other church leaders. Though hardly routine, such visits are required under canon law.

And though bishops answer only to the pope, the pontiff has, relatively recently, assigned some oversight responsibilities to another church authority.

In a May 2010 update of church child abuse laws, Benedict gave the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith the authority to judge cardinals and bishops, as well as priests and deacons. That congregation, once known as the Inquisition, has been a powerful enforcer of church discipline since the 16th century. Scicluna serves the congregation as its promoter of justice.

Thomas Doyle, a priest and canon lawyer who once worked for the pope’s ambassador to Washington, said the congregation’s new authority is intriguing.

“They do have the authority to judge bishops now,” Doyle said. “How they’re going to apply that is going to be very interesting.”

Complete Article HERE!

Pa. church official wants new judge, alleges bias

A Roman Catholic church official wants a judge to step down from his child-endangerment case after she called the church’s sex-abuse crisis “widespread.”

“Anybody that doesn’t think there is widespread sexual abuse within the Catholic Church is living on another planet,” Philadelphia Common Pleas Judge M. Teresa Sarmina said at a Jan. 31 pretrial hearing.

Monsignor William Lynn, 61, is the first U.S. church official charged with child endangerment and conspiracy for allegedly keeping predator priests in ministry.

His lawyers argue in a recusal motion filed Wednesday that Sarmina’s remarks show she is “obviously partial” to prosecutors. They also cite her decision Monday to let the jury hear about abuse complaints involving 21 priests not charged in the case.

Sarmina declined to comment, citing judicial rules on pending cases, according to an aide.

The indictment focuses only on Lynn’s interactions with three priests and a teacher charged with rape. Two of them are being tried separately, leaving just two men at the defense table with him.

“The Court appears to have arrived at a conclusion about the existence of a church-wide conspiracy and Monsignor Lynn’s role in it,” defense lawyers Thomas Bergstrom and Jeffrey Lindy wrote.

They accuse Sarmina of improperly expanding the scope of the trial by admitting the uncharged abuse cases.

“The 22 mini-trials will overshadow, swallow, confuse and prejudice the narrow scope of the two actual charges against Monsignor Lynn, … and transform (his) trial into a trial against the entire Archdiocese of Philadelphia.”

Prosecutors have successfully argued that the other cases show how Lynn, and others, routinely hid abuse complaints in secret church files. They call the archdiocese an unindicted co-conspirator.

Lynn served as secretary for clergy in the archdiocese from 1992 to 2004. Defense lawyers say he was a mid-level bureaucrat who took orders from then-Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua, who had been a key figure in the case. Bevilacqua died last week at age 88.

Prosecutors cannot comment on the filing because of a gag order.
Lynn faces up to 28 years if convicted on all counts. His lawyers also renewed their motion to sever his case from the two remaining co-defendants, the Rev. James Brennan and former priest Edward Avery. Each is charged with raping a teen boy in the mid-1990s.

Jury selection is set to start Feb. 21.

Complete Article HERE!

Local bishop supports same-sex marriage

The Episcopal bishop in Western Washington, in sharp disagreement with Catholic prelates, believes that same-sex marriage is “a conservative proposal” that should be adopted “not only in our society but in our church.”

“It seems to me we have held our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters in a Catch-22,” the Rt. Rev. Greg Rickel, Episcopal bishop of the Diocese of Olympia, argues in a blog post published without fanfare to the diocesan website.

“We say they cannot live up to our values because they cannot be married or even blessed in their union,” writes Rickel.

“While many of them have begged for this, it is still not possible. What they ask of us, the church and the government, is to put boundaries around their relationship, to hold them in the same regard and with the same respect, which would also mean that we expect the same from them.”

The Episcopal Church has wrestled with the issue of “inclusion” over years, gradually moving to accept gay and lesbian clergy — two of whom have been elected as bishops — and to provide rites for same-sex couples. Bishop Rickel predicts marriage equality with be approved at the church’s upcoming General Convention.

The church’s evolving position has generated serious opposition, particularly following election of the Rt. Rev. V. Gene Robinson as the Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire.

Parishes have withdrawn from the Episcopal Church — often generating litigation over church property — and the dioceses of Pittsburgh, Fort Worth and San Jaoquin proclaimed themselves Anglicans and severed ties with the parent church. A few parishes, and one prominent Episcopal bishop, have joined the Catholic Church.

Washington’s four Catholic bishops issued a strong appeal, two weeks ago, that the Legislature maintain the current definition of marriage as between a man and a woman. Seattle Archbishop J. Peter Sartain, in testimony to the Washington state Senate, warned of “the grave challenge this legislation poses to the common good.”

But Rickel takes a very different argument.

“Christianity has held, when considering relationships of all sorts — but especially in relation to two people in marriage — fidelity to be our value,” writes the Episcopal prelate. He depicts marriage equality as an action in furtherance of the common good.

“They (same-sex couples) are not asking for special treatment,” Rickel writes. “They are asking for equal treatment. They are asking to be accountable as a couple, in community.

“To me, this is a conservative proposal. I am for it, and I hope we will finally make way for this to happen, not only in our society, but in our church.”

The Washington state Senate passed marriage equality legislation on a 28-21 vote Wednesday night. The state House of Representatives has scheduled a hearing on the measure for Monday morning. House approval is considered likely.

Gov. Chris Gregoire, a Catholic, supports the legislation and promises to sign it into law. Opponents have vowed to collect the needed 120,577 valid voter signatures to force a referendum in the November election.

Washington would be the seventh state to legalize same-sex marriage.

Complete Article HERE!

Catholic Church Is Biggest Funder Of MN Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment

If you put money in the collection plate at a Catholic church in Minnesota you’re helping to fund a campaign against gay marriage in Minnesota. The Catholic Archdiocese of Minneapolis & St. Paul and the Catholic Dioceses of New Ulm contributed $700,000 last year to support an anti-gay Minnesota constitutional amendment.

The constitutional amendment defining marriage between one man and one woman, effectively banning gay or lesbian marriage, is scheduled to be on this November’s general election ballot. Half of that money, $350,000 has been donated to Minnesota For Marriage which is spearheading the push to get the constitutional amendment approved.

Minnesota For Marriage has also received $226,000 from it’s closely related Minnesota Family Council and $250,000 from the National Organization For Marriage fund. Minnesota for Marriage’s report only list seven individuals who donated for a total of $2,119.

The opposition, Minnesotans United For All Families has raised more than $1.2 million, but lists many more individual donors.

Fundraising reports for groups on both sides of the amendment battle were released by the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board today
Minnesotans United For All Families Report
Minnesota For Marriage Report

All reports for ballot initiatives

Complete Article HERE!