Pope Mexico trip clouded by documents that show Vatican knew of Legion founder’s abuse

Pope Benedict XVI arrives in Mexico this week to a very public reminder of one of the Catholic Church’s most egregious sex abuse scandals: A new book says internal Vatican documents show the Holy See knew decades ago of allegations that the Mexican founder of the disgraced Legion of Christ religious order was a drug addict and pedophile.

The documentation has been compiled in a book “La voluntad de no saber” (“The will to not know”), which is co-authored by Jose Barba, a former Legion priest who along with other priests in 1998 brought a church trial against the Legion’s founder, the Rev. Marciel Maciel, for having sexually abused them while they were seminarians.

While details of the abuse were made public years ago in Mexico and the Spanish-speaking world, the authors aim for a larger international audience, saying they will post key documents on the Internet as part of the book release Saturday. Excerpts of the book published by Proceso magazine on Sunday received little attention in Mexico.

“The importance of this book is that it documents the irrefutable evidence and proof that the Vatican has been lying about Maciel,” said Bernardo Barranco, an expert from the Religious Studies Center of Mexico and author of the prologue of the new text.

The Rev. Richard Gill, a prominent U.S. Legion priest until he left the congregation in 2010 after 29 years, said the documents’ publication could be tumultuous for the order as the Vatican tries to steer it through a process of reform.

“The revelation of these documents, previously unknown to the great majority of Legionaries who acted in good faith, shows that there were solid grounds for the removal of Fr. Maciel more than 50 years ago,” Gill said in an email, calling anew for the Vatican to further investigate how Maciel could have hidden his behavior from public view for so long.

The question of the Vatican’s handling of Maciel and his victims has grown in the lead-up to Benedict’s arrival Friday in Mexico amid speculation that the pope might meet with some of the victims. During foreign trips to the United States, Australia, Britain, Malta and Germany, Benedict has heard firsthand the stories of sexual abuse from victims and prayed with them.

But the Vatican has said no such meeting is planned. Barba and other victims say they wouldn’t meet with Benedict anyway because of his role in the Maciel affair.

The former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Benedict, headed the office that received their complaint in 1998, but it took the Vatican eight years to sanction Maciel for the crimes — during which time the accusers were branded as liars and discredited by the Legion.

Maciel, meanwhile, continued to enjoy Pope John Paul II’s highest regard as the founder of one of the world’s fastest-growing religious orders, able to attract money and vocations to the church despite the mounting accusations against him. John Paul admired the Legion’s orthodoxy and discipline — qualities which set it apart from many other religious orders and made it attractive to many of Mexico’s political and financial elite who sent their children to the Legion’s schools and seminaries.

Benedict took over the Legion in 2010 after the order finally admitted Maciel had molested seminarians and fathered three children with two women. A Vatican investigation determined Maciel, who died in 2008, was a religious fraud who had built an order based on silence and obedience that allowed his double life to go unchecked.

Benedict’s envoy is now trying to reform the order amid charges from former members that they were spiritually and emotionally abused by Maciel’s rigid rules, the cult-like life he created and the religious vows they took preventing them from criticizing their superiors.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Barba said the book was based on information from some 212 documents in a Vatican archive that he said he had obtained from unnamed church officials.

The documentation, he said, demonstrates that the Vatican had information against Maciel as early as 1944 and particularly in the mid-1950s, when the Holy See launched its first investigation into the Mexican-born Maciel. The so-called apostolic visitation lasted from 1956 to 1958, during which time Maciel was suspended as the Legion’s superior, though he was subsequently reinstalled.

The documents “show with complete clarity that the Vatican knew the true nature of this man, the accusations, the opinion of experts, the revision of other experts on top of previous experts, and the opinions that the apostolic visitors gave,” Barba said.

Over the years, damaging documentation has filtered out largely in the Spanish-speaking world showing that Legionary higher-ups and some Mexican bishops were well aware of Maciel’s drug abuse and sexual predilections, and that at least the Vatican’s office responsible for religious orders had been alerted to the problems as early as 1956.

The Catholic blogger Cassandra Jones, for example, has cited letters sent in 1956 from the bishops of Cuernavaca, Mexico, and Mexico City to the Vatican’s office for religious orders recommending Maciel’s removal and a Vatican investigation into what Cuernavaca’s then-bishop Sergio Mendez Arceo termed, “devious and lying behavior, use of narcotic drugs, acts of sodomy with boys of the congregation.”

But “La Voluntad de no saber,” which comes out on Benedict’s first full day in Mexico, promises to compile more complete documentation from the Vatican’s own archives about Maciel’s sins. Critically, since the book is only being published in Spanish in Mexico with an initial run of 6,000 copies, the documentation will be scanned and available at a special website http://www.lavoluntaddenosaber.com, organizers said.

An excerpt of the book was published over the weekend in the Mexican weekly Proceso detailing Maciel’s addiction to morphine, citing a 1954 letter by a Legion priest to the Mexico City vicar that was found in the archives of the congregation for religious orders.

The book also reproduces the 1976 letter by another Maciel victim, Juan Jose Vaca, to Maciel denouncing the years of abuse he suffered, starting when he was a 13-year-old seminarian.

The letter, which has been reproduced elsewhere in the past, is chilling reading: “For me, Father, the disgrace and moral torture of my life began that night in December, 1949,” Vaca wrote. “With the excuse of your pain, you ordered me to stay in your bed.”

Vaca named 20 other Legion and ex-Legion priests who had suffered similar abuse over the years, providing damning accusations that his diocesan bishop in Rockville Center, New York, forwarded simultaneously onto the Vatican, Vaca said.

Benedict himself has acknowledged Maciel was a “false prophet” but has insisted that he only learned the true nature of the allegations against Maciel in 2000. His office received Barba’s complaint in 1998 and the Vatican’s office for religious the Mexican bishops’ charges in 1956. But with the Vatican’s very decentralized fiefdoms, it’s not surprising that accusations that may have landed in one official’s hands were never forwarded on, especially given the sensational nature of the accusations and the esteem that Maciel enjoyed in Rome.

The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, ruled out any papal meeting with Maciel’s victims, saying Mexican bishops hadn’t requested it.

“Where these meetings have taken place, it was in a context in which the bishops asked the pope to do it because it was a problem felt in society and the church, and that it was something desired,” Lombardi told reporters. “In this case, it’s not on the program, so don’t wait for it.”

For their part, Barba and other victims have said they would never agree to a meeting with Benedict since it was his old office — the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith — that had received their case in 1998 and sat on it for eight years while they suffered the Legion’s defamation campaign to discredit them.

“For nothing in the world would I ever meet with someone who protected Maciel when he should have been punished,” said Jose Antonio Perez Olvera, a former Legionary who was sexually abused by Maciel. “We don’t make deals with criminals, nor with those who were their protectors and accomplices.”

However, other former Legionaires said a meeting might have helped heal those who have been hurt by Maciel.

“It could have been a beautiful thing,” said Patricio Cerda, a former Legion priest who heads a Spain-based association of the order’s victims. “Because they obviously are men of a certain age, and will leave this world with this bitterness in their souls.”

But he acknowledged the wounds of Maciel’s original victims run deep: “They were denied the truth of their lives,” he said.

Complete Article HERE!

Catholic Church Historical Reversal: Backed Civil Unions In New Hampshire

For the first time ever, the Roman Catholic church is endorsing civil unions, announcing its second historic reversal in only two weeks.

The Roman Catholic church of New Hampshire suddenly endorsed civil unions on March 19, just 48 hours before a state legislature vote that has been pending for two years. In an equally surprising move, on March 4, the Roman Catholic church of Maine ceased all external opposition to this year’s full marriage equality ballot campaign in Maine.

Historically, Roman Catholic officials have opposed virtually every regulation, policy, and law proposed to protect LGBT people nationwide, including all proposals for civil unions. However, faced with the choice of either retaining New Hampshire’s full marriage law which was signed on 3 June 2009, or else repealing it and replacing it with civil unions instead, church officials decided – for the first time ever – to endorse civil unions for LGBT people.

In a statement issued on March 19, church officials claimed that they are endorsing civil unions only in an attempt to repeal full marriage for same-gender couples. They called the replacement of full marriage with the inferior civil unions an “incremental improvement.”

In lockstep, the National Organization for Marriage, a Roman Catholic church affiliate, also issued a companion surprise announcement the same day, also endorsing civil unions in New Hampshire for similar reasons. NOM was founded by Catholics, is staffed by Catholics, and appears to be mostly funded by Catholic laity and church officials. NOM’s membership rolls and finances are secret, some of its government filings are incomplete or contradictory, and it violates campaign finance disclosure regulations in every state where it opposes marriage equality.

Monday’s reversal in New Hampshire is just as profound as the decision by church officials two weeks ago to withdraw from this year’s public marriage battle in Maine. Neither decision was made independently, and both had to be coordinated with higher church officials. The Manchester Diocese, which is what the Roman Catholic church in New Hampshire calls itself, is a corporation sole and is subordinate to the Ecclesiastical Province of Boston, Massachusetts, which oversees Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont.

Among New Hampshire’s 1,315,809 residents, only 24% (309,987) are Catholic. Consequently, this sudden, last-minute switch by religious leaders only hours before the deadline may not have much impact upon the legislative votes being taken tomorrow. Four recent polls indicate that about 63% of all New Hampshire voters favor retaining the current full marriage law.

In addition to local impacts in Maine and New Hampshire, both of the Catholic church’s recent historic reversals may also help this year’s marriage equality efforts in 18 other states, especially New Jersey, North Carolina, and Minnesota. In New Jersey, advocates need just 15 more votes from the 120-member legislature to override the governor’s recent veto of a law which could upgrade civil unions to full marriage. In Minnesota and North Carolina, the church has been lobbying to ban marriage for all same-gender couples by amending those states’ constitutions so that marriage equality laws can’t even be considered. New Hampshire Bishop Peter Libasci gave no indication of when, whether, or how his church’s endorsement of civil unions in New Hampshire will affect church campaigns in other states.

Within its own religious ranks, Roman Catholic officials are continuing to reinforce Pope Benedict XVI’s formal view of bisexual, lesbian, and gay sexuality as “an intrinsic moral evil,” “intrinsically disordered,” and “inherently evil.” Moreover, the church still promotes the widely discredited “ex-gay” reparative therapy, which they claim cures patients of the sexual orientation that they are born with using a mixture of firm hope, additional prayer, new apparel, and/or life-long celibacy. Such reparative therapies have been discredited and denounced by every major mental/medical health professional organization as ineffective, painful, and dangerous to patients because of higher death rates from suicide.

Complete Article HERE!

Stakes are high for church as ‘failure to report’ case unfolds against Kansas City bishop

The charge is only a misdemeanor, but if prosecutors are able to win a conviction against Kansas City Roman Catholic Bishop Robert Finn, they could be opening up a whole new front in the national priest abuse crisis.

Finn is accused of violating Missouri’s mandatory reporter law by failing to tell state officials about hundreds of images of suspected child pornography found on the computer of a priest in his diocese.

Experts say a criminal conviction against Finn, the highest-ranking church official charged with shielding an abusive priest, could embolden prosecutors elsewhere to more aggressively pursue members of the church hierarchy who try to protect offending clergy.

“Cases can sit like land mines in files for a long time and suddenly come to light,” said Matthew Bunson, a senior fellow at the St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology and co-author of a book, “Pope Benedict XVI and the Sexual Abuse Crisis: Working for Reform and Renewal.” ‘’Those cases may ultimately involve leaders in the church.”

Finn and the Catholic Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph each were charged last year with one count of failing to report. The case involves the Rev. Shawn Ratigan, who remains jailed on state and federal charges accusing him of producing and possessing child pornography. Both have pleaded not guilty, and a judge is scheduled to hear multiple motions in the case Tuesday, including one to dismiss the charges.

“We do not believe that either the facts or the law support a finding of guilt on the misdemeanor charges, and we look forward to a just and fair resolution of them,” the diocese told The Associated Press in an e-mailed statement.

Finn has acknowledged being told in December 2010 about hundreds of photographs of young children found on Ratigan’s laptop computer. Many of the photos focused on the crotch areas of young children who are clothed, though one series showed the exposed genitals of a girl thought to be 3 or 4 years old.

The bishop also has acknowledged that a parish principal warned the diocese of suspicious behavior by Ratigan, including that he was taking compromising pictures of children and let them sit on his lap and reach into his pocket for candy. Those warnings occured more than six months before the photos were found.

Instead of ordering the photos to be turned over to police, or telling the Missouri Children’s Division about them, Finn sent Ratigan out of state for a psychiatric evaluation. When Ratigan returned to Missouri, Finn sent him to the Sisters of St. Francis of the Holy Eucharist, where he would say Mass for the sisters and be away from children.

Only after the church received reports that Ratigan had violated orders from the diocese to stay away from children did the diocese turn over to police last May a disk containing the photos from Ratigan’s computer.

“From the church’s perspective, having your bishop declared a criminal is a big deal, even if it’s only a misdemeanor,” said Douglas Laycock, a religious liberty specialist at the University of Virginia School of Law. “For them, it’s not about the fine, it’s about the statement being made.”

The maximum sentence for the crime is a $1,000 fine and one year in jail, but there’s little chance the bishop would be put behind bars. Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker said some people thought she shouldn’t have filed the charge against Finn, while others thought the charge should have been more serious.

“The prosecutor is not in the business of pleasing people,” she said.

Finn told a grand jury he thought Vicar General Robert Murphy was the diocese’s designated reporter. Murphy testified that even though he was head of a team formed to respond to claims of child sex abuse by priests, he had never been trained on being the mandatory reporter, nor officially assigned that duty.

Separation of church and state also is a significant issue for the church, Laycock said.

“Say a bishop has to report to police everything he knows about a priest under his supervision,” Laycock said. “If child abuse is involved, it may be a sensible and constitutional law. But it certainly intrudes on the supervisory relationship of a bishop and priest.”

Tuesday’s motions hearing comes a day after the trial begins in Philadelphia in a case involving Monsignor William Lynn, the first U.S. church official charged with child endangerment for keeping accused priests in the ministry.

Terry McKiernan of BishopAccountability.org, which manages a public database of records on clergy abuse cases, said the two cases represent a shift toward holding the Catholic Church hierarchy legally accountable for failing to warn parents or police about abusive priests.

“There’s been a lot of attention directed against the Ratigans of the world, but not a lot of attention until recently on the Finns of the world,” McKiernan said. “That’s what makes the church very nervous. It will be devastating for the church if the attention is directed at people like that.”

Complete Article HERE!

Philly monsignor seeks new jury after priest plea

A Roman Catholic church official facing a landmark child sex abuse trial wants a new jury seated because of publicity over a co-defendant’s last-minute guilty plea, his lawyers said Friday.

Monsignor William Lynn’s attorneys said Thursday’s plea from defrocked priest Edward Avery could influence jurors in the trial that’s scheduled to begin Monday.

Lynn, the former secretary for clergy for the Philadelphia Archdiocese, is the first U.S. church official ever charged with endangering children by failing to oust accused predators from the priesthood or report them to police.

The jury was seated early this month and advised not to read about the case. Jury selection took weeks given the sensitive sexual and religious issues involved.

Lynn’s lawyers said they’re loath to repeat the process, but they deem it necessary, given the extensive news coverage. The judge could question jurors Monday about what they’ve seen or read.

Avery, 69, entered a surprise plea Thursday, admitting he sexually assaulted a 10-year-old altar boy in a church sacristy in 1999. He was immediately sentenced to a negotiated 2 1/2 to five years in prison. Avery hasn’t agreed to cooperate in the case against Lynn and Avery, prosecutors said Friday.

The trial is expected to last several months as prosecutors detail abuse complaints against the Rev. James Brennan, Avery and 22 other priests. Lynn knew or should have known the men were dangerous and shouldn’t remain in parish work around children, prosecutors allege.

Lynn had reviewed secret archives at the archdiocese that held the sex abuse complaints and prepared a list of 37 accused priests still on the job in 1994. He argues that he gave the list to Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua, but Bevilacqua had it shredded. Bevilacqua died in January, but his videotaped deposition could still be used at trial.

Lynn faces up to 28 years in prison if convicted of all counts.

Brennan, 48, is charged with raping a 14-year-old boy in 1996 during a sleepover at the priest’s apartment. Brennan was on leave from the church at the time. The boy told his parents the next day.

“Unfortunately, (his) parents, who viewed Fr. Brennan as both a close friend and a pillar of the community, accepted his version of events,” according to the grand jury report filed last year.

Brennan and Lynn have pleaded not guilty.

Avery’s victim told authorities he was raped at St. Jerome’s Parish in northeast Philadelphia by three men: Avery, the Rev. Charles Engelhardt and his sixth-grade teacher, Bernard Shero. The abuse started in 1999 and ended four years later. Defense lawyers have challenged the accuser’s credibility, noting his longtime drug addiction and criminal record.

The man’s civil lawyer wants an apology, given Avery’s plea.

“I’d like to see an apology now for the things that have been said about my client,” lawyer Slade McLaughlin told The Philadelphia Inquirer.

Brennan had also been at St. Jerome’s, from 1997-98, although the abuse charged did not occur there.

Engelhardt and Shero are being tried later in the year, because they were not archdiocesan priests and didn’t report to Lynn.

Complete Article HERE!